editorinchief@ijsreat.com +91 9840521421 Scholarly Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Refereed Journal e-ISSN 2583-1240 Since 2021
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2026
  4. Vol. 6 Issue 3
  5. Article
Original Article

Comparison of Destructive and Non-Destructive Tests on Conventional Concrete by Replacement of Fine Aggregate with Quarry Dust

  • Paper ID 322
  • Volume 6, Issue 3
  • Pages 85-90
  • Published Online: May-June 2026
  • 28 Views
Open Access Peer Reviewed Crossref DOI

Authors

  • Jagadeesh1
  • A Mrudula Christopher2

1 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Ananthalakshmi Institute of Technology and Sciences (Autonomous), Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Article Information

Published Online
May-June 2026
Pages
85-90
Article Type
Original Article
Check for updates
check update

References

1. Mohammadreza Hamidian, Ali Shariati, M. M. Arabnejad Khanouki, "Application of Schmidt rebound hammer and ultrasonic pulse velocity techniques for structural health monitoring," Scientific Research and Essays, Vol. 7(21), pp. 1997–2001, 2012.
2. Deepak Jain, V.V. Singh, "Comparative Study of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes with Silica Fumes Based on Ultrasonic Pulse
Velocity (UPV) and its Density," International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Vol. 5, Issue 11, Nov. 2017.
3. Siddharth Shankar, Hikmat Raj Joshi, "Comparison of Concrete Properties determined by Destructive and Non-Destructive Tests," Journal
of the Institute of Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 130–139.
4. Sakshi Gupta, "Comparison of Non-Destructive and Destructive Testing on Concrete," ASET, Amity University Haryana, 2018.
5. Bhosale and Salunkhe, "Correlation between Destructive and Nondestructive Testing of Concrete," Experimental study, 2016.
6. Mulik et al., "Mechanical Characteristics of Concrete using SONReb Combined Testing Method," 2015.
7. Konapure and Richardrobin, "Relationship between Rebound Hammer Testing and Destructive Testing for M20 and M25 Grade Concrete,"
2015.
8. Patil et al., "Comparative Study of Effect of Curing on Strength of Concrete using DT and NDT Methods," 2015.
9. Damodar and Gupta, "Ideal Curve Equation for Predicting Compressive Strength of Concrete," 2014.
10. IS 10262:2009, "Concrete Mix Proportioning — Guidelines," Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
11. IS 456:2000, "Plain and Reinforced Concrete — Code of Practice," Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
12. IS 13311 (Part 1 & 2):1992, "Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete — Methods of Test," Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
13. IS 5816:1999, "Splitting Tensile Strength of Concrete — Method of Test," Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
14. IS 12269:2013, "Ordinary Portland Cement, 53 Grade — Specification," Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
APC from ₹1200 + 18% GST

Peer-reviewed open access₹1200 Indian (₹1400 with DOI)$80 USD internationalpaid after acceptance Peer-reviewed open access₹1200 Indian$80 USD international ₹1200 Indian · $80 intl

  • CrossRef DOI
  • ISSN 2583-1240
  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Plagiarism Checked
  • Google Scholar
Submit Paper