editorinchief@ijsreat.com +91 9840521421 Scholarly Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Refereed Journal e-ISSN 2583-1240 Since 2021
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2025
  4. Vol. 5 Issue 6
  5. Article
Original Article

A Machine Learning Framework for Automatic and Continuous MMN Detection with Preliminary Results for Coma Outcome Prediction

  • Paper ID 254
  • Volume 5, Issue 6
  • Pages 105-112
  • Published Online: November-December 2025
  • 9 Views
Open Access Peer Reviewed Crossref DOI

Authors

  • Hari Chandana1
  • Amogha P2
  • Bhumika S3
  • Chandana KN4
  • Chithra PK5

1 Professor, Guide, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Rajarajeswari College of Engineering, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 2 3 4 5 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Rajarajeswari College of Engineering, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Article Information

Published Online
November-December 2025
Pages
105-112
Article Type
Original Article
Check for updates
check update

References

1. G. B. Young, A. H. Ropper, and C. F. Bolton, Coma and Impaired Consciousness: A Clinical Perspective. New York,NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
2. N. M. Kane, S. R. Butler, and T. Simpson, “Coma outcome prediction using event-related potentials: P3 and mismatch negativity,” Audiology and Neurotology, vol.no. 3–4, pp. 186–191, 2000.
3. H. L. Lew, J. H. Poole, A. Castaneda, R. M. Salerno, and M. Gray, “Prognostic value of evoked and event-related potentials in moderate to severe brain injury,” Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 350–360, 2006.
4. C. C. Duncan et al., “Event-related potentials in clinical research: Guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol.120, no. 11, pp. 1883–1908, 2009.
5. “The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review,”Clinical Neurophysiology.
6. R. Näätänen, A. W. Gaillard, and S. Mäntysalo, “Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted,” Acta Psychologica, vol.42, no. 4, pp. 313–329, 1978.
7. D. H. Loewy, K. B. Campbell, D. R. de Lugt, M. Elton, and A. Kok, “Mismatch negativity during natural sleep: Intensity deviants,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 863–872,2000.
8. M. Macdonald, P. Jamshidi, and K. Campbell, “Infrequent increases in stimulus intensity may interrupt central executive functioning during REM sleep,” NeuroReport, vol. 19, no. 3, pp.309–313, 2008.
9. L. D. Sculthorpe, D. R. Ouellet, and K. B.Campbell, “MMN elicitation during natural sleep to violations of an auditory pattern,” Brain Research, vol. 1290, pp. 52–62, 2009.
10. M. Strauss et al., “Disruption of hierarchical predictive coding during sleep,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 112, no.11pp. E1353–E1362, 2015.
11. S. Blain-Moraes et al., “Normal brain response to propofol in advance of recovery from unresponsive wakefulness syndrome,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 248, 2016.
12. W. Heinke et al., “Sequential effects of increasing propofol sedation on frontal
APC from ₹1200 + 18% GST

Peer-reviewed open access₹1200 Indian (₹1400 with DOI)$80 USD internationalpaid after acceptance Peer-reviewed open access₹1200 Indian$80 USD international ₹1200 Indian · $80 intl

  • CrossRef DOI
  • ISSN 2583-1240
  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Plagiarism Checked
  • Google Scholar
Submit Paper